- 05/17/2019 at 5:41 am #874988EduGorillaKeymasterSelect Question Language :
The Danish parliament’s passing of a bill to seize refugees’ valuables to pay for their upkeep is perhaps a classic case of how not to “welcome” people who have already endured every conceivable ordeal in their flight from war, starvation and near-death, and traversed thousands of miles to dignify what’s left of their lives. Yet, the Danish government would argue that the problem is one of semantics, compounded by the insensitive phrasing of the law, whereby police would be able to confiscate valuables worth more than €1,340 to pay for said refugee’s housing and food. Lawmakers point out the Danish welfare state is based on the principle of everyone using up “their own” resources first.
Which among the following is the most logical inference that can be made from the above passage?
Post your Training /Course EnquiryAre You looking institutes / coaching center for
The author does not agree with Danish government giving help to refugees.
The author does not agree in “everyone using up “their own” resources first” principle to be applied to the migrants.
The author is most likely to agree with police confiscating valuables from refugees
The arguments of author and the Danish government are similar.
- IIT-JEE, NEET, CAT
- Bank PO, SSC, Railways
- Study Abroad