This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  EduGorilla 2 years, 8 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #874988 Reply
     EduGorilla 
    Keymaster
    Select Question Language :


    The Danish parliament’s passing of a bill to seize refugees’ valuables to pay for their upkeep is perhaps a classic case of how not to “welcome” people who have already endured every conceivable ordeal in their flight from war, starvation and near-death, and traversed thousands of miles to dignify what’s left of their lives. Yet, the Danish government would argue that the problem is one of semantics, compounded by the insensitive phrasing of the law, whereby police would be able to confiscate valuables worth more than €1,340 to pay for said refugee’s housing and food. Lawmakers point out the Danish welfare state is based on the principle of everyone using up “their own” resources first.

    Which among the following is the most logical inference that can be made from the above passage?

    Options :-

    1. The author does not agree with Danish government giving help to refugees.

    2. The author does not agree in “everyone using up “their own” resources first” principle to be applied to the migrants.

    3. The author is most likely to agree with police confiscating valuables from refugees

    4. The arguments of author and the Danish government are similar.

    Post your Training /Course Enquiry
    Are You looking institutes / coaching center for
    • IIT-JEE, NEET, CAT
    • Bank PO, SSC, Railways
    • Study Abroad
    Select your Training / Study category
Reply To: The Danish parliament’s passing of a bill to seize refugees’ valuables to pay for their upkeep i….
Your information:




Verify Yourself




Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account