This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  EduGorilla 2 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #631424 Reply
     EduGorilla 
    Keymaster
    Select Question Language :


    In which case, where the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to the immense inconvenience of the opposite party, was it held by the Supreme Court that seeking adjournments for postponing the examination of witnesses who were present without making other arrangements for examining such witnesses is a dereliction of the duty that an advocate owed to the Court, amounting to misconduct?

    Options :-

    1. N. G. Dastane v. Shrikant S. Shinde
    2. Noratanman Courasia v. MR. Murali
    3. Sambhu Ram Yadav v. Hanuman Das Khatry
    4. None of the above
    Post your Training /Course Enquiry
    Are You looking institutes / coaching center for
    • IIT-JEE, NEET, CAT
    • Bank PO, SSC, Railways
    • Study Abroad
    Select your Training / Study category
Reply To: In which case, where the advocate of one of the parties was asking for continuous adjournments to th….
Your information:




GET UPTO 50%    OFF!
Verify Yourself




Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account