This topic contains 0 replies, has 0 voices, and was last updated by  EduGorilla 2 years ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #960180 Reply
     EduGorilla 
    Keymaster
    Select Question Language :


    Governments may have to take steps which would otherwise be an infringement on the Fundamental Rights of individuals, such as acquiring a person’s land against his will, or refusing permission for putting up a building, but the larger public interest for which these are done must be authorized by the people (Parliament). Discretionary powers to the administration can be done away with. It is becoming more and more difficult to keep this power within limits as the government has many number of tasks to perform. Where discretion has to be used, there must be rules and safeguards to prevent misuse of that power. Systems have to be devised which minimise, if not prevent, the abuse of discretionary power. Government work must be conducted within a framework of recognised rules and principles, and decisions should be similar and predictable.

    Which among the following is the most logical assumption that can be made from the above passage?

    Options :-

    1. Government should always be given wide discretionary power in all matters of administration.

    2. The supremacy of rules and safeguards should prevail as opposed to the influence of exclusive discretion of authority.

    3. Parliamentary democracy is possible only if the Government has wider discretionary power.

    4. None of the above statements is a logical assumption that can be made from this passage.

    Post your Training /Course Enquiry
    Are You looking institutes / coaching center for
    • IIT-JEE, NEET, CAT
    • Bank PO, SSC, Railways
    • Study Abroad
    Select your Training / Study category
Reply To: Governments may have to take steps which would otherwise be an infringement on the Fundamental Right….
Your information:




Verify Yourself




Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account