- 07/13/2019 at 11:16 am #1432707EduGorillaKeymasterSelect Question Language :
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the question.
The popular view of towns and cities in developing countries and of urbanisation process is that despite the benefits and comforts it brings, the emergence of such cities connotes environmental degradation, generation of slums and squatters, urban poverty, unemployment, crimes, lawlessness, traffic chaos etc. But what is the reality? Given the unprecedented increase in urban population over the last 50 years from 300 million in 1950 to 2 billion in 2000 in developing countries, the wonder really is how well the world has coped, and not how badly.
In general, the urban quality of life has improved in terms of availability of water and sanitation, power, health and education, communication and transport. By way of illustration, a large number of urban residents have been provided with improved water in urban areas in Asia’s largest countries such as China, India, Indonesia and Philippines. Despite that, the access to improved water in terms of percentage of total urban population seems to have declined during the last decade of 20th century, though in absolute numbers, millions of additional urbanites have been provided improved services. These countries have made significant progress in the provision of sanitation services too, together, providing for an additional population of more than 293 million citizens within a decade (1990-2000). These improvements must be viewed against the backdrop of rapidly increasing urban population, fiscal crunch and strained human resources and efficient and quality-oriented public management.
Which of the following is/are not considered the indicator(s) of urban quality of life?
Post your Training /Course EnquiryAre You looking institutes / coaching center for
- Tempo of urbanisation
- Provision of basic services
- Access to social amenities
- All of the above
- IIT-JEE, NEET, CAT
- Bank PO, SSC, Railways
- Study Abroad